This thing about 38% of RT. Do you know how accurate RT is? It gets reviews from the big critics, but TONS of bloggers. AND the fact that they either call a film positive or negative is what killed S3. If it's marginally positive then it goes into the stash of extremely positive and if it's marginally negative it goes into the pile of horrible reviews. Hence Scream 3.
Metacritic is a much more fair website of judging reception. It actually calucates the critic's actual grade (not just if they liked it or didn't like it). Metacritic is only the real critics...not bloggers, which also makes it more fair. The Metacritic scores for all three films:
Scream 1: 65
Scream 2: 63
Scream 3: 56 Scream 3 *beep*-head don't believe me? http://www.metacritic.com/movie/scream-3
They are all in a range of 10 points. It didn't fail at all
AND as for it not doing as well at the box office...so what? It made 90 million, that's only 10 off from the first. It didn't flop by any means. Plus the Scary Movie was just released which probably turned alot of people off. And it didn't have a great release date (Feb compared to Christmas).
You people act like Scream 3 compares to All About Steve. It makes me sick. Even if I didn't like Scream 3, but liked the first two I wouldn't bash a part of the series to my favorite films. That's pretty insulting to yourselves.
The last time I checked this was the Scream 4 board, not the "Do nothing but B!tch and complain that Kevin wasn't credited as a writer on Scream 3" board.
I'm all for having an opinion, but I'm not for being obnoxious as heck with it. JEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEZ! Holy balls.